« A talk with Sam Zell | Main | Anderson and his professor think I'm right »

Storylines that sell are inherently news

Folks on “Reliable Sources” today with Howard Kurtz took turns bashing reputable news outlets for covering Paris Hilton. And, I’m sick of it.

It’s this redundantly pompous reaction to pop culture that helps destroy journalism. Newspapers and television are mass mediums. That means success requires attracting lots of people. Pop culture is what those people have in common.

Calling your audience’s culture dumb is the same as calling your audience dumb. That’s not going to win any viewers. So, shut up already.

Journalists don’t get to decide what’s important. If you haven’t realized that yet, then I’m sorry to have to break it to you. The people decide.

Journalism is a service. Cover what the ratings tell you to cover. Promote what the stats say works. Because they’re not just numbers; those are votes. Ignoring the votes means people will change the channel, or newspaper, or magazine, etc.

If you do a good enough job listening to your viewers or readers, then they let you pick a few stories. They want you to cover the less dramatic, but seriously important. But the agreement, and it is an agreement, is that you first cover what they want.

Instead of letting these stories devolve into sessions of self-loathing, journalists should cover these soap operas better. (That shouldn’t be difficult: MSNBC actually put famed pothead Tommy Chong on the air to analyze the Paris Hilton sentence.)

Law & Order has long been one of the most popular shows on television. Boston Legal is watched by millions. They’re successful, in part, because entire story lines are “ripped from the headlines.”

WWOD? What would Oprah do? She’s rich for a reason. The thing people forget about Oprah is she’s a journalist at her roots.

On her show, expect to hear from the kids who idolize Paris. How do their parents deal with that? She’d find the person whose family was killed by an intoxicated driver to illustrate the consequences of Paris’ actions. Maybe we’d talk with a psychologist about how growing up rich affects a person’s view of the world. Then talk to a rich person who went to jail about how it changed them. I could go on and on.

But the media can’t. All they can do is report the latest thing to have happened, so they report the same tidbit 10,000 times and ask talking heads for their vapid reactions. Thoughtless coverage is killing journalism.

Stop deploring what the people want. Stop being annoyed by your audience. Start listening, and then start actually thinking up some worthwhile ways to cover these stories.

Comments (5)

Wasn't there a study recently that found that the best informed people had some striking things in common --

-- they watched the daily show and/or corbert report
-- and they followed the hilton story

These were people who were bright, educated and news junkies ... our core audience ...

It's not just the shopping-line Enquire crowd that follows celebrity news.

I think when you realize that, you realize that being a serious journalist and making room for Paris Hilton are not contradictory positions.

That said, I think the cable networks tend to go overboard, but then that's the nature of the beast.

The problem with the cable news networks isn't so much that they go overboard, it's that they repeat the same information over and over without ever adding a new angle.

All they do is switch out the talking heads who argue with each other about the merits of the news.

Come up with some actual story ideas and it wouldn't be so bad.

Well said! Like it or not, news consumers are customers, something that is denied by many journalists at their own peril. The upscale tend to want news of government, business, and a little bit of sensationalism. The downscale can do with less of the government and business stuff. And everyone wants news on things that affect their lives directly, explaining the popularity of Social Computing, which is news about friends and family. (Steve Boriss, The Future of News)

Excellent points, Lucas. Particularly the part about finding a different angle to take advantage of the opportunity such a story presents. I mean, how about the prison system, for one? For heaven's sake, you could wait years for such a great excuse to write about how people are treated when taken to jail, how they are processed through the courts. A great peg for a meaningful story -- but it seems that very few journalists recognize that opportunity.

Jarred Wilson:

Hi Lucas! This one I finally understood. :) Good blog!

About this post

This page contains a single entry from the blog posted on June 24, 2007 4:31 PM.

The previous post in this blog was A talk with Sam Zell.

The next post in this blog is Anderson and his professor think I'm right.

Many more can be found on the main index page or by looking through the archives.

About Lucas

Creative Commons License
This weblog is licensed under a Creative Commons License.
Powered by
Movable Type 3.33